Essay On The Dot Books
When I was growing up in East Texas we didn’t have any money for books. My reading room was the small local library run by an organization of business professional women. To this moment, I can remember checking out my first two volumes -- one was Jules Verne’s Around the World in 80 Days; the other was a primer on Greek and Roman mythology (don’t ask me why.) Years later, when I walked into the much larger library at the state college as a freshman, I was practically overwhelmed. I looked down row after row of books and periodicals and thought: “Wow! All this for me?!” Some of the best hours of my life were spent in that library. I even considered majoring in library science, so that I could be near those books.
Which is one reason it pains me today that even in this modern day and age, some folks in communities across America are saying: “No. That Book ISN’T For You” and for reasons that have nothing to do with the community, the school, or the reader -- and everything to do with prejudice.
The American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom reports 326 attempts last year to remove or restrict books from school curricula and libraries. Add those to thousands of formal complaints filed with a library or school in the last two decades -- complaints about a book’s content or appropriateness. Can you believe some people don’t want other people to read Brave New World, The Color Purple, To Kill A Mockingbird, Catcher in the Rye, Of Mice and Men, The Kite Runner, A Wrinkle in Time, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, A Light in the Attic, the Harry Potter series, and – ironic if not surprising – Fahrenheit 451.
Think of it: some of the most inspiring and mind-opening words ever written, threatened with removal because they offended a self-deputized vigilante over who wants to deny an entire community’s curiosity and passion to learn.
Censorship is the enemy of truth -- even more than a lie. A lie can be exposed; censorship can prevent us knowing the difference. This is one reason that on my public television broadcast, Moyers & Company, we call out the censors every time we can. And it’s why we’re so grateful to the ALA – as well as the librarians, writers, booksellers, publishers, and neighbors who stand with the Association in observing the 30th anniversary of Banned Books Week, taking place this year from September 30 – October 6.
Banned Books Week reminds us of the foundation of our freedom -- the First Amendment -- and the freedom of all of us – including our kids – to read and think and nurture the life of the mind.
You can learn more about banned books and banned books week at BillMoyers.com, ALA-DOT-ORG-SLASH-B-BOOKS, bannedbooksweek.org, or your local bookstore or library. Let’s tell the censors -- nothing doing.
I’m Bill Moyers. And you read me right.
Looking, Purpura writes, is a way of paying attention; it is an almost spiritual practice, and it was "the sole practice I had available to me as a child." In these 18 pieces, the essayist (Increase) looks at colors (brown and red seem to be favorites), at shape and time, at dead bodies, weather, fear. The most trenchant essay muses about women being seen. These pieces are not so much essays as prose poems, lyrical hymns to beauty and aesthetics. Purpura describes single objects beautifully: Chinese lanterns are "those orange, papery pods gone lacy in fall, with a dim, silver berry burning inside." Though her putative topic is the visual, Purpura also ponders language, explaining word games and playing with the precision of diction (which verb best describes the things you do to drapes, she wonders: do you draw them, shut them or pull them?). Indeed, Purpura's prose is sometimes a tad too opaque: "If I can call the pin image, memento, moment suspended, then the whole northeastern Ohio sky draws close...." This slim volume requires careful, slow parsing, but readers who persevere will be rewarded with Purpura's deep intelligence. (Aug.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.